State v. M.D. - Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Right to Counsel Granted

0 minute read

State v. M.D.

Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Right to Counsel Granted

CASE DISMISSED

Marana Municipal Court
Count 1: DUI Impaired to the slightest degree
Count 2: DUI 0.08 or more
Count 3: Extreme DUI 0.15 or more
Count 4: Super Extreme DUI 0.20 or more
BAC: Blood 0.290


Result: I filed a Motion to Dismiss for a violation of M.D.'s right to counsel. Upon her arrest, she
requested to speak with a lawyer. The officers acknowledged her request but failed to provide
her a phone or put her in a phone room instead of locking her in a holding cell until drawing her
blood nearly 2 hours later. After an Evidentiary Hearing, the Judge granted my Motion to
Dismiss for a Violation of the Right to Counsel and dismissed the entire case. M.D. was also facing a
12-month implied consent suspension for refusing the blood draw. I argued she did not refuse
the blood draw she merely requested a lawyer which was within her rights. The Administrative
Law Judge agreed and voided the 12-month suspension.

GET A FREE CASE REVIEW

Contact us today to schedule an appointment

Fill out my online form.

RECENT NEWS

man in court room for sentencing
By Michael Alarid June 23, 2026
Sentencing hearings involve arguments, evidence, and factors the judge may consider. Michael Alarid explains what Phoenix defendants can expect.
witness being questioned
By Michael Alarid June 23, 2026
A changed witness statement can affect credibility, strategy, and negotiations. Michael Alarid explains how Arizona criminal defense cases may be impacted.
signing plea deal
By Michael Alarid June 23, 2026
Similar charges can lead to different plea offers based on evidence, history, risk, and negotiation. Michael Alarid explains what Phoenix defendants should know.
Show More