State v. M.D. - Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Right to Counsel Granted

0 minute read

State v. M.D.

Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Right to Counsel Granted

CASE DISMISSED

Marana Municipal Court
Count 1: DUI Impaired to the slightest degree
Count 2: DUI 0.08 or more
Count 3: Extreme DUI 0.15 or more
Count 4: Super Extreme DUI 0.20 or more
BAC: Blood 0.290


Result: I filed a Motion to Dismiss for a violation of M.D.'s right to counsel. Upon her arrest, she
requested to speak with a lawyer. The officers acknowledged her request but failed to provide
her a phone or put her in a phone room instead of locking her in a holding cell until drawing her
blood nearly 2 hours later. After an Evidentiary Hearing, the Judge granted my Motion to
Dismiss for a Violation of the Right to Counsel and dismissed the entire case. M.D. was also facing a
12-month implied consent suspension for refusing the blood draw. I argued she did not refuse
the blood draw she merely requested a lawyer which was within her rights. The Administrative
Law Judge agreed and voided the 12-month suspension.

GET A FREE CASE REVIEW

Contact us today to schedule an appointment

Fill out my online form.

RECENT NEWS

Phone data and cloud evidence
By Michael Alarid April 15, 2026
Text messages, location data, and cloud records can be challenged in court. Learn how digital evidence is obtained, common problems, and defenses that may apply.
No contact order in Arizona
By Michael Alarid April 15, 2026
Learn what violates a no contact order in Arizona, what counts as contact (including social media and third parties), consequences of violations, and how to avoid mistakes.
Forensic interviews in criminal cases
By Michael Alarid April 15, 2026
Forensic interviews can shape a criminal case. Learn when they’re used, how suggestibility affects credibility, and how defense attorneys may challenge them in court.
Show More