State v. M.D. - Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Right to Counsel Granted

0 minute read

State v. M.D.

Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Right to Counsel Granted

CASE DISMISSED

Marana Municipal Court
Count 1: DUI Impaired to the slightest degree
Count 2: DUI 0.08 or more
Count 3: Extreme DUI 0.15 or more
Count 4: Super Extreme DUI 0.20 or more
BAC: Blood 0.290


Result: I filed a Motion to Dismiss for a violation of M.D.'s right to counsel. Upon her arrest, she
requested to speak with a lawyer. The officers acknowledged her request but failed to provide
her a phone or put her in a phone room instead of locking her in a holding cell until drawing her
blood nearly 2 hours later. After an Evidentiary Hearing, the Judge granted my Motion to
Dismiss for a Violation of the Right to Counsel and dismissed the entire case. M.D. was also facing a
12-month implied consent suspension for refusing the blood draw. I argued she did not refuse
the blood draw she merely requested a lawyer which was within her rights. The Administrative
Law Judge agreed and voided the 12-month suspension.

GET A FREE CASE REVIEW

Contact us today to schedule an appointment

Fill out my online form.

RECENT NEWS

criminal being sentenced by judge
By Michael Alarid • October 23, 2026
Mitigating factors, plea negotiations, and case circumstances may affect sentencing. Michael Alarid explains what Phoenix defendants should consider.
lawyers looking for last minute evidence
By Michael Alarid • October 23, 2026
New evidence can emerge after criminal charges are filed. Michael Alarid explains how late evidence may affect Arizona cases and defense strategies.
suspect being questioned for crime
By Michael Alarid • October 23, 2026
Statements made before an arrest may still be used as evidence. Michael Alarid explains what Phoenix defendants should know about their rights.
Show More