State v. M.D. - Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Right to Counsel Granted

0 minute read

State v. M.D.

Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Right to Counsel Granted

CASE DISMISSED

Marana Municipal Court
Count 1: DUI Impaired to the slightest degree
Count 2: DUI 0.08 or more
Count 3: Extreme DUI 0.15 or more
Count 4: Super Extreme DUI 0.20 or more
BAC: Blood 0.290


Result: I filed a Motion to Dismiss for a violation of M.D.'s right to counsel. Upon her arrest, she
requested to speak with a lawyer. The officers acknowledged her request but failed to provide
her a phone or put her in a phone room instead of locking her in a holding cell until drawing her
blood nearly 2 hours later. After an Evidentiary Hearing, the Judge granted my Motion to
Dismiss for a Violation of the Right to Counsel and dismissed the entire case. M.D. was also facing a
12-month implied consent suspension for refusing the blood draw. I argued she did not refuse
the blood draw she merely requested a lawyer which was within her rights. The Administrative
Law Judge agreed and voided the 12-month suspension.

GET A FREE CASE REVIEW

Contact us today to schedule an appointment

Fill out my online form.

RECENT NEWS

alcohol blood testing for DUIs
By Michael Alarid August 28, 2026
Blood test evidence can be challenged over collection, storage, lab handling, or testing accuracy. Michael Alarid explains what Arizona DUI defendants should know.
man at phoenix DUI check point taking  breathalyzer
By Michael Alarid August 21, 2026
Breath tests can be challenged over calibration, maintenance, officer procedure, or medical issues. Michael Alarid explains what Arizona DUI cases may involve.
confidential documents
By Michael Alarid August 14, 2026
Confidential informants can affect investigations, searches, and evidence in drug cases. Michael Alarid explains what Arizona defendants should understand.
Show More